Description: Data was modified to reflect signficant change (additions or removal) within the limits of stated map accuracy standards and the limits of what could be interpreted from aerial photography.Planimetric mapping was compiled to industrry standards using established methodologies, flight altitudes, control and processes to meet or exceed ASPRS Class 1 accuracies for 1"=100' mapping, consistent with existing data sets and past mapping projects. Field checks were not performed.ATTRIBUTESFeatures were assigned attributes for the following:Data filtered down to Surface Type = Sidewalk (7), Sidewalk_Bridge (8)Material: Asphalt, Concrete, Grass Pavement, Gravel, Other (applies to footbridges or playground material only,), Pavement, Pavers, Permeable Pavers, Pervious Concrete, Porous Asphalt, Water, Impervious surface features updated and developed into final polygons included:Sidewalk: Public and private paved or concrete sidewalks were included. Gravel or dirt paths were not included. In many cases the sidewalk attribute was assigned to sidewalks where crossing paved driveways. However, this varies and is not consistent due to the varying methodologies used in existing data. Sidewalk_bridge was assigned to footbridges where part of the sidewalk network.Material type: Pavement and Gravel attributes were determined within limits of interpretation from aerial imagery. In many instances it was difficult to interpret material type and field verification may be required. Pavement was assigned to concrete or asphalt parking, sidewalk, driveways, roadways or pads. Gravel was assigned to unpaved parking, roadway or driveway areas. Gravel pads (areas with no obvious parking or driveway use) or gravel paths were not collected. Water was assigned to all pools. Other was assigned to Sidewalk_bridge features (footbridges). Field verification of surface type or material was not performed.GENERAL PROCESSPrepared byDAVID C. SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC.1734 SE Tacoma Street, Portland, Oregon, 97202 http://www.davidsmithmapping.cominfo@davidsmithmapping.com Job #: 2334 Supervising Professionals: Scott Smith, Certified Photogrammetrist, Oregon Professional Photogrammetrist # 38670 RPP; Doug Smith, Certified Photogrammetrist, Oregon Professional Engineer # 16707 Source photographyCamera: UltraCam XP, S/N UC-SXp-CI-10411033 (Bergman Photographic Services, Inc.) Calibration Date: 12/11/2012 (Factory Calibration) NOTE: Standard USGS calibration does not apply to digital cameras. USGS certifies the camera manufacture and factory calibration process but does not calibrate individual cameras. Calibrated Focal Length: 100.5 mm Date of Photography: 5/29/2015 Approx. Time of Flight: 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Pacific Daylight Time Flight specifications0.3' pixel Ground Sample Distance(maximium) Nominal Flight Altitude: 4,600' Above Ground Level Nominal Photo Scale: 1058 ft/inch (1:12700) ControlDatum: NAD '83/'2011, U.S. Survey Feet Projection: LAMBERT CONICAL, Washington, SOUTH ZONE Ground Control: Air-borne GPS control was acquired and tied to new City of Olympia control. Existing City ground control was also used to provide datum consistency. New premarks and survey points were established. Aerotriangulation Solution: Aerotriangulation was performed to industry standards as supported by photo scale and available existing City control. Aerotriangulation solution was designed to support 1"=50' scale, 2' contour mapping within the UGB extents of existing control and 1"=50' scale, Accuracies for discrete aerotriangulation points and supported stereomodel measurements are: +/- 0.5' horizontal and vertical. Data set AccuracyHORIZONTAL ACCURACY: Compiled to meet ASPRS Class 1 accuracies for 1"=100' scale mapping, consistent with existing data sets from past mapping work. This is equal to an ASPRS 2014 30 cm RMSE horizontal accuracy class equating to a circular horizontal accuracy of +/- 2.4' at a 95% confidence level. VERTICAL ACCURACY: NOT APPLICABLE Data Collection and Update ProcessSoftcopy photogrammetric workstations were used to view and evaluate existing City GIS impervious surface data against current (2015) stereo imagery using 3D softcopy photogrammetry methods for planimetric data updates. Photogrammetric vector linework was collected and coded by feature type. Impervious area polygons were built using polygon ID points to identify selected impervious surface polygons. Final polygon builds were generated using automated methods and manually reviewed for consistency and completeness.