ArcGIS REST Services Directory
JSON

Technoeconomic_Exclusion_Wind (FeatureServer)

View In:   Map Viewer

Service Description: The techno-economic screens and exclusion criteria described in this document were used to filter utility-scale wind energy resource potential for the Western U.S. These screens were developed for the California Public Utilities Commission Integrated Resource Planning Process (IRP) by E3 and Montara Mountain Energy. The techno-economic screens were developed using spatial analysis methods consistent with prior studies -7. Locations which are not suitable for commercial-scale renewable energy development are screened out to produce a set of land use scenarios.

Service ItemId: b99eaaf368c54953844b578a92b0cd63

Has Versioned Data: false

Max Record Count: 2000

Supported query Formats: JSON

Supports applyEdits with GlobalIds: False

Supports Shared Templates: False

All Layers and Tables

Layers:

Description:

The site suitability criteria included in the techno-economic land use screens are listed below. As this list is an update to previous cycles, tribal lands, prime farmland, and flood zones are not included as they are not technically infeasible for development. The techno-economic site suitability exclusion thresholds are presented in table 1. Distances indicate the minimum distance from each feature for commercial scale wind development. 

Attributes: 

Table 1.<o:p></o:p>

 

Wind<o:p></o:p>

Steeply sloped areas

>10o

Population density

>100/km2

Capacity factor

<20%

Urban areas

<1000 m

Water bodies

<250 m

Railways

<250 m

Major highways

<125 m

Airports

<5000 m

Active mines

<1000 m

For more information about the processes and sources used to develop the screening criteria see sources 1-7 in the footnotes.

Data updates occur as needed, corresponding to typical 3-year CPUC IRP planning cycles

  Lopez, A. et. al. “U.S. Renewable Energy Technical Potentials: A GIS-Based Analysis,” 2012. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/51946.pdf  
2 https://greeningthegrid.org/Renewable-Energy-Zones-Toolkit/topics/social-environmental-and-other-impacts#ReadingListAndCaseStudies 
3 Multi-Criteria Analysis for Renewable Energy (MapRE), University of California Santa Barbara. https://mapre.es.ucsb.edu/ 
4 Larson, E. et. al. “Net-Zero America: Potential Pathways, Infrastructure, and Impacts, Interim Report.” Princeton University, 2020. https://environmenthalfcentury.princeton.edu/sites/g/files/toruqf331/files/2020-12/Princeton_NZA_Interim_Report_15_Dec_2020_FINAL.pdf.
5 Wu, G. et. al. “Low-Impact Land Use Pathways to Deep Decarbonization of Electricity.” Environmental Research Letters 15, no. 7 (July 10, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab87d1.
6 RETI Coordinating Committee, RETI Stakeholder Steering Committee. “Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative Phase 1B Final Report.” California Energy Commission, January 2009.
7 Pletka, Ryan, and Joshua Finn. “Western Renewable Energy Zones, Phase 1: QRA Identification Technical Report.” Black & Veatch and National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2009. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/46877.pdf.
  https://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/geo/shapefiles/index.php?year=2019&layergroup=Urban+Areas 
  https://ezmt.anl.gov/
  https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=fc870766a3994111bce4a083413988e4
  https://mrdata.usgs.gov/mineplant/ 



Copyright Text: Emily Leslie Emily@MontaraMtEnergy.com Sam Schreiber sam.schreiber@ethree.com Jared Ferguson Jared.Ferguson@cpuc.ca.govOluwafemi Sawyerr femi@ethree.com

Spatial Reference: 102100 (3857)

Initial Extent:
Full Extent:
Units: esriMeters

Child Resources:   Info

Supported Operations:   Query   ConvertFormat   Get Estimates   Create Replica